Assessing Adverse Outcomes and Learning Needs in Canadian Psychiatric Independent Medical Examinations.

Despite the importance of independent medical examinations (IMEs), there is virtually no literature on the risks to the IME assessor nor the learning needs of psychiatrists in this area. To address this deficit, a retrospective chart review of nearly 38,000 cases from the Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) identified 108 files involving complaints or legal actions against psychiatrists performing IMEs. Most complaints identified by the CMPA were to regulatory bodies, including biased opinion, inadequate assessment, inappropriately relying on a requester's information without independent evaluation, nonadherence to regulatory body policies, cursory documentation lacking relevant details, and communication breakdowns. A survey by the Canadian Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (CAPL) and the Canadian Psychiatric Association (CPA) had 306 Canadian psychiatrist respondents. About 37 percent of psychiatrists completing IMEs reported medico-legal consequences, including complaints to regulatory authorities. Only 40 percent of those doing IMEs and 20 percent of all psychiatrists had formal training in doing IMEs. The studies confirm that despite a low but important risk of medico-legal consequences, many psychiatrists performing IMEs do not have formalized training. Using the new CAPL Canadian Guidelines for Forensic Psychiatry Assessment and Report Writing is a step to reduce the risk of such evaluations.

Evaluación mediante script concordance test del razonamiento clínico de residentes en Atención Primaria / Clinical reasoning evaluation using script concordance test in primary care residents

Introducción: Actualmente desconocemos el razonamiento clínico objetivo de los residentes durante su formación, lo que impide orientar su reciclaje formativo a solventar los déficits detectados. El script concordance test (SCT) evalúa el razonamiento clínico planteando situaciones clínicas reales, pero aún no ha sido utilizado en España con contenidos propios de Atención Primaria. Por ello consideramos relevante diseñar un SCT de Atención Primaria que cumpla los criterios de validez, fiabilidad y aceptabilidad descritos en la bibliografía. Métodos: Elaboración, corrección y validación de un SCT para evaluar el razonamiento clínico en Atención Primaria de los residentes y que incluya variables sociolaborales para estudiar su posible relación con la puntuación obtenida. Resultados: Nuestro cuestionario fue aprobado por un comité de expertos, alcanzó una fiabilidad y accesibilidad adecuadas, y distinguió a los expertos de los residentes. No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en función de la edad, género, tipo y duración de la formación recibida en Atención Primaria, y la realización de un curso sobre dicha formación. Conclusiones: Se construyó un SCT que obtuvo la aprobación por parte de un comité de expertos, cumplió con los criterios de fiabilidad y accesibilidad, y permitió objetivar diferencias significativas en el razonamiento clínico de los expertos y residentes. Excepto en el 2.o año de residencia, no se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas respecto al año formativo dentro de la residencia, la edad, el género, la realización y duración de la rotación en Atención Primaria y la realización de un curso sobre dicha formación. (AU)

Introduction: Actual unawareness about paediatric resident's residency program factual clinical reasoning precludes professional retraining directed to solve deficiencies. Script concordance test (SCT) evaluates clinical reasoning due to its orientation to usual clinical practice but surprisingly it has not been used in Spain for Paediatric Primary Care clinical reasoning evaluation so far. Due to this we consider to be of relevance to design a paediatric primary care SCT which meets validity, reliability and accessibility criteria described in bibliography.Methods: Development, validation and application of an SCT questionnaire for clinical reasoning analysis in paediatric primary care applied on a population of paediatric residents and which includes demographic and employment data in order to study possible relationship between them and achieved scores.Results: Our SCT was approved by an experts committee. It met reliability and accessibility criteria and it allowed distinguishing experts from paediatric internal residents. No statistically significant differences were found concerning age, gender, type and duration of the training received in Primary Care, and the completion of a course on that training.Conclusions: We developed an SCT that was approved by a Paediatric Experts Committee, it met reliability and accessibility criteria and it allowed distinguishing clinical reasoning from experts and paediatric internal residents. Except second year residency program, we did not objectified relevant differences in residency program year, age, gender, duration and realization of Paediatric Primary Care rotation, and training course realisation. (AU)

What is the effect of independent medical evaluation on days on sickness benefits for long-term sick listed employees in Norway? A pragmatic randomised controlled trial, the NIME-trial.

BACKGROUND: Independent medical evaluations are used to evaluate degree and reason for work disability, uncertainty around the functional status, and/or the employee's rehabilitation potential in several jurisdictions, but not in Norway. The main aim of this trial was to test the return to work effect of independent medical evaluation (IME) (summoning and consultation) compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in Norway, for workers who have been on continuous sick leave for 6 months. METHODS: This was a pragmatic randomised controlled trial including all employees aged 18-65 years, sick-listed by their general practitioner and on full or partial sick leave for the past 26 weeks in Hordaland County, Norway in 2015/16. Trial candidates were drawn from a central register at the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration at 22 weeks of sick leave. Pregnant women, individuals with cancer or dementia diagnoses, those with secret address, employed by NAV or sick listed by the specialist health services were excluded. Separate regression analyses were conducted to investigate the "intention-to-treat" and "treatment on the treated" effects, using the ordinary least squares and instrumental variable methods, respectively. RESULTS: After exemption based on predefined exclusion criteria, 5888 individuals were randomised to either IME (n = 2616) or TAU (n = 2599). The final intervention group constitutes 1698 individuals, of which 937 attended the IME consultation. No baseline differences were found between the IME and TAU group regarding gender, age, and previous sick leave. Individuals attending the IME were older than those who cancelled the appointment ((47/45), p = 0.006) and those who did not show up without cancelling ((47/42), p < 0.001). Mainly the IME physician agreed with the regular GP upon level of sick leave. In cases with different assessments, the difference tended to be towards a lower sick leave level. There were no intention to treat or treatment on the treated effect on days of sick leave after randomisation during follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the analyses showed no effect of IME on changes in sick leave for sick listed employees. This result was consistent for those who were offered an IME consultation (intention to treat) and those who undertook an IME consultation (treatment on the treated). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTirals.gov trial number NCT02524392 first registration 14.08.2015.

Construct Validation of the American Board of Anesthesiology's APPLIED Examination for Initial Certification.

BACKGROUND: The American Board of Anesthesiology administers the APPLIED Examination as a part of initial certification, which as of 2018 includes 2 components-the Standardized Oral Examination (SOE) and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). The goal of this study is to investigate the measurement construct(s) of the APPLIED Examination to assess whether the SOE and the OSCE measure distinct constructs (ie, factors). METHODS: Exploratory item factor analysis of candidates' performance ratings was used to determine the number of constructs, and confirmatory item factor analysis to estimate factor loadings within each construct and correlation(s) between the constructs. RESULTS: In exploratory item factor analysis, the log-likelihood ratio test and Akaike information criterion index favored the 3-factor model, with factors reflecting the SOE, OSCE Communication and Professionalism, and OSCE Technical Skills. The Bayesian information criterion index favored the 2-factor model, with factors reflecting the SOE and the OSCE. In confirmatory item factor analysis, both models suggest moderate correlation between the SOE factor and the OSCE factor; the correlation was 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.55) for the 3-factor model and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.54-0.64) for the 2-factor model. The factor loadings were lower for Technical Skills stations of the OSCE (ranging from 0.11 to 0.25) compared with those of the SOE and Communication and Professionalism stations of the OSCE (ranging from 0.36 to 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: The analyses provide evidence that the SOE and the OSCE measure distinct constructs, supporting the rationale for administering both components of the APPLIED Examination for initial certification in anesthesiology.

Third-party Assessments/Independent Medical Evaluations.

A position paper developed by the Canadian Psychiatric Association's (CPA) Professional Standards and Practice Committee and approved by the CPA Board of Directors on May 25, 2020.

Prorenin and active renin levels in paediatrics: a bioanalytical review.

As part of the extended renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, active renin and its precursor prorenin have been an area of research interest for decades. Although several studies showed a correlation with disease, other studies found no significant association, e.g. attributed to limited sample size or pharmacological effects of antihypertensive drugs. Since the measurement of both proteins has typically been carried out in adult populations, the data in paediatrics is limited. This review aimed to collate the current data on plasma renin and prorenin levels in children and compare the levels of healthy vs. the diseased state. A literature search using Medline resulted in 213 publications of which 15 studies were classified as relevant. In the extant studies in the literature, an age-dependent decline of renin plasma concentration was observed in newborns compared to adolescents. For children with cardiovascular disease, five studies were identified that provide limited insight into the pathophysiological regulation of renin. In general, sample handling is still a crucial step, which might particularly affect measured active renin concentrations due to conformational changes of its precursor prorenin. A reliable assessment for prorenin levels in the maturating population is yet not possible due to the low number of available publications. Three different approaches to quantify prorenin were found and raise the question on the comparability of these methods. The review emphazised several weaknesses and highlights the need for an accurate procedure to determine levels of active renin as well as prorenin in its closed and open form.

Independent medical evaluation of general practitioners' follow-up of sick-listed patients: a cross-sectional study in Norway.

OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to examine the sufficiency of general practitioners' (GPs) follow-up of patients on sick leave, assessed by independent medical evaluators. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study SETTING: Primary health care in the Western part of Norway. The study reuses data from a randomised controlled trial-the Norwegian independent medical evaluation trial (NIME trial). PARTICIPANTS: The intervention group in the NIME trial: Sick-listed workers having undergone an independent medical evaluation by an experienced GP at 6 months of unremitting sick leave (n=937; 57% women). In the current study, the participants were distributed into six exposure groups defined by gender and main sick leave diagnoses (women/musculoskeletal, men/musculoskeletal, women/mental, men/mental, women/all other diagnoses and men/all other diagnoses). OUTCOME MEASURE: The independent medical evaluators assessment (yes/no) of the sufficiency of the regular GPs follow-up of their sick-listed patients. RESULTS: Estimates from generalised linear models demonstrate a robust association between men with mental sick leave diagnoses and insufficient follow-up by their regular GP first 6 months of sick leave (adjusted relative risk (RR)=1.8, 95% CI=1.15-1.68). Compared with the reference group, women with musculoskeletal sick leave diagnoses, this was the only significant finding. Men with musculoskeletal diagnoses (adjusted RR=1.4, 95% CI=0.92-2.09); men with other diagnoses (adjusted RR=1.0, 95% CI=0.58-1.73); women with mental diagnoses (adjusted RR=1.2, 95% CI=0.75-1.77) and women with other diagnoses (adjusted RR=1.3, 95% CI=0.58-1.73). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment by an independent medical evaluator showed that men with mental sick leave diagnoses may be at risk of insufficient follow-up by their GP. Efforts should be made to clarify unmet needs to initiate relevant actions in healthcare and work life. Avoiding marginalisation in work life is of the utmost importance. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02524392; Post-results.

Improving management of comorbidity in patients with colorectal cancer using comprehensive medical assessment: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Screening for and active management of comorbidity soon after cancer diagnosis shows promise in altering cancer treatment and outcomes for comorbid patients. Prior to a large multi-centre study, piloting of the intervention (comprehensive medical assessment) was undertaken to investigate the feasibility of the comorbidity screening tools and proposed outcome measures, and the feasibility, acceptability and potential effect of the intervention. METHODS: In this pilot intervention study, 72 patients of all ages (36 observation/36 intervention) with newly diagnosed or recently relapsed colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled and underwent comorbidity screening and risk stratification. Intervention patients meeting pre-specified comorbidity criteria were referred for intervention, a comprehensive medical assessment carried out by geriatricians. Each intervention was individually tailored but included assessment and management of comorbidity, polypharmacy, mental health particularly depression, functional status and psychosocial issues. Recruitment and referral to intervention were tracked, verbal and written feedback were gathered from staff, and semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 13 patients to assess screening tool and intervention feasibility and acceptability. Interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically. Patients were followed for 6-12 months after recruitment to assess feasibility of proposed outcome measures (chemotherapy uptake and completion rates, grade 3-5 treatment toxicity, attendance at hospital emergency clinic, and unplanned hospitalisations) and descriptive data on outcomes collated. RESULTS: Of the 29 intervention patients eligible for the intervention, 21 received it with feedback indicating that the intervention was acceptable. Those in the intervention group were less likely to be on 3+ medications, to have been admitted to hospital in previous 12 months, or to have limitations in daily activities. Collection of data to measure proposed outcomes was feasible with 55% (6/11) of intervention patients completing chemotherapy as planned compared to none (of 14) of the control group. No differences were seen in other outcome measures. Overall the study was feasible with modification, but the intervention was difficult to integrate into clinical pathways. CONCLUSIONS: This study generated valuable results that will be used to guide modification of the study and its approaches prior to progressing to a larger-scale study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospective, 26 August 2019, ACTRN12619001192178.

Independent medical evaluation for sick-listed workers in Norway: A focus group study of the experience of IME doctors.

BACKGROUND: Norwegian politicians have proposed the use of an independent medical evaluation (IME) as a possible solution for reducing long-term sick leave. The use of an IME implies that a new doctor interferes in the relationship between sick-listed workers and their general practitioner (GP). The aim of the current study was to explore experiences of IME doctors from an ongoing randomized controlled trial (the NIME trial evaluating the effect of IME in Norway). METHODS: Two focus group interviews were conducted with eight of the nine IME doctors employed in the NIME trial. The discussions were audio-taped and transcribed. Systematic text condensation was used for analysis. RESULTS: The participants reported that the IME provides important second opinions, which they felt empowered the sick-listed workers and provided new insights into their condition. Beneficial IME working conditions and enhanced insight into different sick leave measures were crucial to this perceived usefulness. Some of the participants expressed disappointment with GPs acting as passive conductors and struggled to provide feedback politely. Some adjustments were proposed as necessary for the IME to be implemented nationwide. CONCLUSIONS: The participants seemed to have gained a different stakeholder identity by sometimes seeing GPs, their peers, as obstacles to return to work and welcomed the use of IME on a regular basis.

Independent medical evaluation for sick-listed patients: a focus group study of GPs´ expectations and experiences.

BACKGROUND: Norwegian general practitioners (GPs) are important stakeholders because they manage 80% of people on long-term sick-leave. Independent medical evaluation (IME) for long-term sick-listed patients is being evaluated in a large randomized controlled trial in one county in Norway in an effort to lower the national sick-leave rate (the NIME trial: Effect Evaluation of IME in Norway). The aim of the current study was to explore GPs' expectations of and experiences with IMEs. METHODS: We conducted three focus group interviews with a convenience sample of 14 GPs who had had 2-9 (mean 5) of their long-term sick-listed patients summoned to an IME. We asked them to recollect and describe their concrete expectations of and experiences with patients assigned to an IME. Systematic text condensation, a method for thematic cross-case analysis, was applied for analysis. RESULTS: To care for and to reassure their assigned sick-listed patients, the participants had spent time and applied different strategies before their patients had attended an IME. The participants welcomed a second opinion from an experienced GP colleague as a way of obtaining constructive advice for further sick-leave measures and/or medical advice. However, they mainly described the IME reports in negative terms, as these were either too categorical or provided unusable advice for further follow-up of their sick-listed patients. The participants did not agree with the proposed routine use of IMEs but instead suggested that GPs should be able to select particularly challenging sick-listed patients for an IME, which should be performed by a peer. CONCLUSION: Our participants showed positive attitudes towards second opinions but found the regular IMEs to be unsuitable. The participants did however welcome IMEs if they themselves could select particularly challenging patients for a mandatory second opinion by a peer but emphasized that IME-doctors should not be able to overrule a GP's sick-leave recommendation. These findings, together with other evaluations, will serve as a basis for the Norwegian government's decision on whether or not to implement IMEs for long-term sick-listed patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02524392 . Registered 23 June, 2015.

General Aviation Accidents Involving Octogenarian Airmen: Implications for Medical Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: No upper age limit exists at which general aviation pilots are disallowed from exercising their flying privileges. Operating an aircraft, and landing in particular, requires high visual acuity, cognitive function, and eye-hand/foot coordination; i.e., functions which commonly deteriorate with age. No studies have addressed flight safety of airmen ≥ 80 yr of age (octogenarian+ or 80+) or whether such airmen are more landing accident-prone. This research seeks to answer these questions. METHODS: Accidents and private pilot-certificated airmen counts were obtained from the National Transport Safety Board accident database and the U.S. Civil Airmen Statistics, respectively. Contingency tables were used to determine differences in proportions. A Poisson distribution was employed to determine whether airmen count (80+ and 30-39 yr) and their accident rates differed over time. Differences in median values were tested with a Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: The proportion of airmen 80+ years doubled and their accident rate increased (6 and 11 mishaps/1000 airmen, respectively) between 2002 and 2016. Landing accidents were over-represented for octogenarian+ pilots compared with airmen 30-39 yr (31 and 17%, respectively) and did not reflect inferior experience but were often due to an aircraft flaring deficiency. The proportion of fatal accidents was comparable (11 and 13%, respectively) for the older and younger age cohorts. CONCLUSION: A growing population and a climbing accident rate for octogenarian+ airmen were evident. The disproportionate count of pilots involved in landing mishaps raises a concern for an increase in such mishaps for octogenarian airmen opting for BasicMed due to less restrictive/frequent visual acuity tests.Boyd DD. General aviation accidents involving octogenarian airmen: implications for medical evaluation. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018; 89(8):687-692.

Patient-accident-fracture (PAF) classification of acute distal radius fractures in adults.

There is not enough evidence in the literature to support the use of any classification system for distal radius fractures (DRF) in adults. However, there is a need for identification of more homogeneous groups of patients with DRF so that the extent of preoperative workup and sophistication of treatment would best match the needs of the patient. The authors propose an innovative method to analyse and stratify acute DRF in adults. A one-page chart includes criteria related to the patient (P), the energy of the accident (A) and the pathology of the fracture (F). Analysis of the pathology includes not only the distal radius itself but also the associated ulnar and carpal lesions. Radiological suspicion of associated carpal of distal radio-ulnar joint ligamentous injuries is included in the analysis. The preliminary results of the use of this chart in 1610 consecutive adult patients (16-102 years) with unilateral acute DRF are presented. A total of six homogeneous groups of patients are described, and the relevance of this classification regarding the therapeutic options is discussed.

Sick-listed workers' expectations about and experiences with independent medical evaluation: a qualitative interview study from Norway.

PURPOSE: To reduce the country's sick leave rate, Norwegian politicians have suggested independent medical evaluations (IMEs) for sick-listed workers. IME was tested in a large, randomized controlled trial in one Norwegian county (Evaluation of IME in Norway, or 'the NIME trial'). The current study´s aim was to explore sick-listed workers' expectations about and experiences with participating in an IME. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nine individual semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted. Our convenience sample included six women and three men, aged 35-59 years, who had diverse medical reasons for being on sick leave. Systematic text condensation was used for analysis. RESULTS: The participants questioned both the IME purpose and timing, but felt a moral obligation to participate. Inadequate information provided by their general practitioner (GP) to the IME doctor was considered burdensome by several participants. However, most participants appreciated the IME as a positive discussion, even if they did not feel it had any impact on their follow-up or return-to-work process. CONCLUSIONS: According to the sick-listed workers the IMEs were administered too late and disturbed already initiated treatment processes and return to work efforts. Still, the consultation with the IME doctor was rated as a positive encounter, contrary to their expectations. Our results diverge from findings in other countries where experiences with IME consultations have been reported as predominantly negative. These findings, along with additional, upcoming evaluations, will serve as a basis for the Norwegian government's decision about whether to implement IMEs on a regular basis. Key points  Independent medical evaluations for sick-listed workers has been tested out in a large Norwegian RCT and will be evaluated through qualitative interviews with participating stakeholders and by assessing the effects on RTW and costs/benefits. In this study, we explored sick-listed workers' expectations about and experiences with participating in an IME. • Participants questioned both the IME purpose and timing, but felt a moral obligation to participate. • Inadequate information provided by their general practitioner (GP) to the IME doctor was considered burdensome by several participants • Sick-listed workers appreciated the IME as a positive discussion, even if they did not feel it had any impact on their follow-up or return-to-work process.

Are Concerns About Irremediableness, Vulnerability, or Competence Sufficient to Justify Excluding All Psychiatric Patients from Medical Aid in Dying?

Some jurisdictions that have decriminalized assisted dying (like Canada) exclude psychiatric patients on the grounds that their condition cannot be determined to be irremediable, that they are vulnerable and in need of protection, or that they cannot be determined to be competent. We review each of these claims and find that none have been sufficiently well-supported to justify the differential treatment psychiatric patients experience with respect to assisted dying. We find bans on psychiatric patients' access to this service amount to arbitrary discrimination. Proponents of banning the practice ignore or overlook alternatives to their proposal, like an assisted dying regime with additional safeguards. Some authors have further criticized assisted dying for psychiatric patients by highlighting allegedly problematic practices in those countries which allow it. We address recent evidence from the Netherlands, showing that these problems are either misrepresented or have straightforward solutions. Even if one finds such evidence troubling despite our analysis, other jurisdictions need not adopt every feature of the Dutch system.

Protocol for the effect evaluation of independent medical evaluation after six months sick leave: a randomized controlled trial of independent medical evaluation versus treatment as usual in Norway.

BACKGROUND: It has been discussed whether the relationship between a patient on sick leave and his/her general practitioner (GP) is too close, as this may hinder the GP's objective evaluation of need for sick leave. Independent medical evaluation involves an independent physician consulting the patient. This could lead to new perspectives on sick leave and how to follow-up the patient. METHODS/DESIGN: The current study is a randomized controlled trial in a Norwegian primary care context, involving an effect evaluation, a cost/benefit analysis, and a qualitative evaluation. Independent medical evaluation will be compared to treatment as usual, i.e., the physicians' and social insurance agencies' current management of long-term sick-listed patients. Individuals aged 18-65 years, sick listed by their GP and on full or partial sick leave for the past 6 months in Hordaland county will be included. Exclusion criteria are pregnancy, cancer, dementia or an ICD-10 diagnosis. A total sample of 3800 will be randomly assigned to either independent medical evaluation or treatment as usual. Official register data will be used to measure the primary outcome; change in sickness benefits at 7, 9 and 12 months. Sick listed in other counties will serve as a second control group, if appropriate under the "common trend" assumption. DISCUSSION: The Norwegian effect evaluation of independent medical evaluation after 6 months sick leave is a large randomized controlled trial, and the first of its kind, to evaluate this type of intervention as a means of getting people back to work after long-term sickness absence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02524392 . Registered June 23, 2015.

Use of a structured functional evaluation process for independent medical evaluations of claimants presenting with disabling mental illness: rationale and design for a multi-center reliability study.

BACKGROUND: Work capacity evaluations by independent medical experts are widely used to inform insurers whether injured or ill workers are capable of engaging in competitive employment. In many countries, evaluation processes lack a clearly structured approach, standardized instruments, and an explicit focus on claimants' functional abilities. Evaluation of subjective complaints, such as mental illness, present additional challenges in the determination of work capacity. We have therefore developed a process for functional evaluation of claimants with mental disorders which complements usual psychiatric evaluation. Here we report the design of a study to measure the reliability of our approach in determining work capacity among patients with mental illness applying for disability benefits. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a multi-center reliability study, in which 20 psychiatrists trained in our functional evaluation process will assess 30 claimants presenting with mental illness for eligibility to receive disability benefits [Reliability of Functional Evaluation in Psychiatry, RELY-study]. The functional evaluation process entails a five-step structured interview and a reporting instrument (Instrument of Functional Assessment in Psychiatry [IFAP]) to document the severity of work-related functional limitations. We will videotape all evaluations which will be viewed by three psychiatrists who will independently rate claimants' functional limitations. Our primary outcome measure is the evaluation of claimant's work capacity as a percentage (0 to 100 %), and our secondary outcomes are the 12 mental functions and 13 functional capacities assessed by the IFAP-instrument. Inter-rater reliability of four psychiatric experts will be explored using multilevel models to estimate the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Additional analyses include subgroups according to mental disorder, the typicality of claimants, and claimant perceived fairness of the assessment process. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that a structured functional approach will show moderate reliability (ICC ≥ 0.6) of psychiatric evaluation of work capacity. Enrollment of actual claimants with mental disorders referred for evaluation by disability/accident insurers will increase the external validity of our findings. Finding moderate levels of reliability, we will continue with a randomized trial to test the reliability of a structured functional approach versus evaluation-as-usual.

Who receives a medical evaluation for infertility in the United States?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate characteristics of receiving a medical evaluation for infertility among infertile women. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Academic institution. PATIENT(S): A total of 7,422 women who reported incident infertility between 1989 and 2009 in the Nurses' Health Study II. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Report of receiving a medical evaluation for infertility. RESULT(S): Approximately 65% of women who reported infertility had a medical evaluation for infertility. Infertile women who were parous (relative risk [RR] = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.84), older, current smokers (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.96), or who had a higher body mass index (BMI) were less likely to report receiving a medical infertility evaluation. Infertile women who exercised frequently, took multivitamins (RR = 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.07), lived in states with comprehensive insurance coverage (RR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.19), had a high household income, or who had a recent physical examination (RR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.24) were more likely to report receiving a medical infertility evaluation. CONCLUSION(S): These findings highlight demographic, lifestyle, and access barriers to receiving medical infertility care. Historically, the discussion of barriers to infertility care has centered on financial access, geographic access, and socioeconomic status. Our findings build off literature by supporting previously reported associations and showcasing the importance of demographic and lifestyle factors in accessing care.